|
For the Basic Income Grant to eradicate extreme poverty and close the "poverty gap" by 74%, it
must be administered and delivered in a way that is widely accessible, flexible and suited to the
needs of beneficiaries.
Current system of grant administration
Currently, social assistance is administered through each province separately, which means that
there are no national norms or standards.
In most provinces, grant applications are made through government "application points".
Officials scrutinise the applications to see whether the applicant complies with the complex
means test.
If the beneficiary is successful, then payment of grants is made in a number of ways. The most
common method of payment is through pay points - points at which people receive payment
through the services of a company that has been contracted by the state to pay out grants.
There are a number of problems with using pay points. These include:
- Long queues
Citing safety reasons, the payment companies do not advise in advance the time at which
delivery of money will take place, so people have to queue from early morning.
- Unreliable money supply
Frequently the company delivering payment will run out of money for the day and so people
will have to return the next day to repeat the process.
- Safety
Because the payment company has to carry such a lot of cash, their vehicles are frequently
hijacked and attacked. This means that the system poses a danger to the employees of the
company, and also adds to the cost of the service because of the amount of insurance that has
to be taken out to cover losses.
- Expense
In 2001, payment companies charged the government between R13.99 and R23.06 per grant
per month.
Alternatively, grants may be paid directly into a Post Bank or other bank account. In 2001, the
cost per grant for those administered through the Post Office was R11.39 per grant. Those paid
through the banking institutions cost the state on average 90c for a one-day service, and R1.82
for a five day service. (1)
However, the vast majority of current grant recipients do not have bank accounts, and are unable
to open accounts because of the stringent requirements of most banks. In addition, the high
charges that banks assess on other account transactions make it prohibitively expensive for many
poor households to use the banks, even though for those living in areas that have access to ATMs
and banks, this is by far the easiest method.
Redesigning the system
The current delivery system is seriously flawed. It is unable to deliver existing grants reliably
and efficiently, and it would be incapable of coping with the increased demands of a BIG.
The government has recognised that the grant administration and delivery system must be
radically overhauled. Cabinet has already approved the establishment of a single national grant
agency, taking the function out of the Department of Social Development (DSD), and also
centralising the payment functions. Legislation setting up this agency should be enacted in the
first half of next year.
The question remains: what kind of system could cope with payment of a basic income grant to
everyone in South Africa?
Home Affairs National Identification System
A number of public and private bodies, including the Department of Home Affairs (DHA) and
the Reserve Bank, are developing "smart card" technology. The Department of Home Affairs is
already in the process of introducing a "smart" Identity Card to replace ID books. This card will
have an electronic chip built into it that will store personal information, such as your identity
details, driving licence, state hospital health records, access to other basic services, etc. The card
will also have the holder's thumbprint on the face of it, to assist in biometric identification
(identification based on unique physical traits). This will ensure that no one else can use your
card. Alternatively, the card could be protected by a pin number like current banking cards.
Using smart cards to deliver grants
The smart chip would enable the card to carry information about social grants. This data could
be updated every month. The card holder could then use the card like a debit card - until the
value has been depleted. This would mean that everyone could access the value of a grant
without having to stand in long queues.
Smart card technology can be used to deliver social grants in a number of ways. For people
living in urban areas, the cards could be used to draw cash at ATMs. For those in more rural
areas, the possibility of having remote points of access at local spaza shops will mean local
access with far less travelling and queuing.
Resolving the issues associated with the delivery of the BIG can also facilitate the development
of more efficient grant administration systems, extend rural infrastructure and promote
development. For example, Post Bank Public Information terminals could be used to load the
value of the grant onto the card every month. Placement of terminals in community halls should
also be investigated.
The role of the Department of Public Service and Administration should also be explored,
especially with respect to the multi-purpose community centres that the Department is
establishing throughout the country.
Practical considerations
Because of the need to load all current fingerprints onto the new system, HANIS will only be up
and running in about 3 years time. The DHA is committed to giving children and other
vulnerable groups first priority in terms of accessing the services.
The DSD has already begun to stipulate that all contracting paymasters have to ensure that the
technology that they use is compatible with the HANIS technology, which will aid the transition.
Cabinet has already decided that pensions will be the first application to be rolled out when
smart ID cards are issued.
The current redesign of the grant delivery system creates a unique opportunity to introduce new
technology with the capacity to administer and deliver a Basic Income Grant.
Getting there…
It is imperative that the lead government organisations recognise the urgency for the completion
of a state smart card. The government must also take steps to encourage rationalisation of the
various independent smart card initiatives already underway. In particular, the private payment
companies must be compelled to ensure that their payment technology is compatible with
HANIS to avoid strictly proprietorial systems.
In terms of the declaration of the August NEDLAC Financial Sector Summit, both private and
public financial institutions have committed to developing accessible financial services for all,
including payment facilities appropriate for social assistance delivery. These undertakings must
be enforced. Private institutions who do not wish to open more branches in rural areas should
considered contributing to the capacitation of the Post Bank.
In addition, the DSD needs to consider their immediate needs with regard to delivery of grants.
The BIG Coalition needs to continue to engage with the department to ensure that the system
that they select will be capable of delivering a BIG to avoid duplication in costs of delivery
systems.
Many people working in civil society and other stakeholders have knowledge about what
systems will be most advantageous to beneficiaries. In addition, there are a number of
technological experts that could be called on for their expertise.
The BIG Coalition thus calls on the government to set up a task team to consider, as a matter of
urgency, the logistics of delivering a BIG and the other components of a comprehensive social
protection package, as recommended by the government-appointed Commission of Inquiry into
a Comprehensive Social Security System.
12 December 2002
1 Table 5.15, 2001Intergovernmental Fiscal Review
|